Skip to content
Foundation6 min

Bodyline: The 1932-33 Ashes Series That Almost Split Cricket

The Bodyline series of 1932-33 saw England bowl deliberately at Donald Bradman's body, causing a diplomatic crisis between England and Australia. Learn what Bodyline was, why it worked, and how the Laws changed in response.

Written by GeoCric EditorialUpdated Jul 22, 2026
ShareShareWhatsAppFacebook

Bodyline was a bowling tactic used by England during the 1932-33 Ashes tour of Australia, devised by captain Douglas Jardine and executed primarily by Harold Larwood. The strategy aimed to neutralise Donald Bradman — who had scored 974 runs in the 1930 Ashes at an average of 139.14 — by bowling at high pace directly at or short of the batter's body, with a packed leg-side field.

How Bodyline Worked

Larwood bowled at speeds approaching 90 mph, pitching the ball short of a length on leg stump or outside leg. Batters were forced to fend the ball off their bodies into a ring of close leg-side fielders. The tactic was legal but considered unsportsmanlike — it restricted scoring, threatened physical harm, and was specifically designed to exploit Bradman's instinct to get inside the line.

The Diplomatic Crisis

After England's controversial win at Adelaide in the 3rd Test — where Australian batters Bert Oldfield and Bill Woodfull were badly injured — Cricket Australia (then ABCA) sent a cable to the MCC calling Bodyline unsportsmanlike. The MCC responded defending England. The diplomatic furore briefly threatened relations between the two countries; Australia threatened to cancel the series and withdraw from the Empire.

Result and Aftermath

England won the 1932-33 Ashes 4-1. Bradman averaged only 56.57 in the series — extraordinary for any other batter, but far below his norms. After the series, the laws were amended to restrict negative leg-side fields. Harold Larwood never played Test cricket again after refusing to apologise; Jardine also retired from international cricket shortly after.

Don Bradman's career Test batting average was 99.94 — the greatest statistical achievement in cricket history. His Bodyline series average of 56.57 was the only time Bodyline tactics meaningfully suppressed him.

Frequently asked questions

Was Bodyline legal?

Yes — at the time, Bodyline did not break any Laws of Cricket. The Laws were subsequently amended to restrict aggressive leg-side fields and 'dangerous and unfair bowling'.

Why was Bodyline so controversial?

It was designed to injure or intimidate batters rather than dismiss them through skill. Batters faced 90 mph deliveries aimed at their bodies with no room to play conventional shots.