Skip to content
Foundation5 min

Cricket Broadcasting: Hawk-Eye, UltraEdge and How Technology Changed the Game

Modern cricket broadcasts have transformed from simple ball-by-ball radio commentary to a multi-technology spectacle featuring ball-tracking (Hawk-Eye), edge detection (UltraEdge/Snickometer), thermal imaging (HotSpot), and 60-frame-per-second stump cameras. These technologies now directly influence match outcomes through the Decision Review System (DRS). Understanding what each technology does — and its limitations — is essential for following the modern game.

Written by GeoCric EditorialUpdated Invalid Date
ShareShareWhatsAppFacebook

The evolution of cricket broadcasting: Cricket was first broadcast on BBC radio in 1927 (England vs Australia, the Ashes at Old Trafford). Test Match Special — BBC's ball-by-ball radio commentary — began in 1957 and continues today as one of sport's longest-running broadcast programs. Television: the first televised cricket match was England vs Australia in 1938 (Lord's). Australian TV coverage of the 1977 World Series Cricket (Kerry Packer's private competition) transformed cricket broadcasting — introducing multiple cameras, slow-motion replays, on-screen graphics, and professional commentators who analysed rather than just described. The 1977 Packer revolution: Kerry Packer, unable to secure broadcast rights from the Australian Cricket Board for Australian TV, created his own competition (World Series Cricket) and broadcast it on Channel 9 with a production style borrowed from American sports television. The result: close-up cameras on the pitch, bright uniforms, night cricket, and highly polished studio presentation. Within 5 years, every major broadcaster had adopted Packer's approach. The modern broadcast: a typical IPL or international T20 match uses 30-35 cameras (compared to 6-8 in the 1990s), 8 stump cameras (inside the stumps, filming the batsman from ground level), a spider-cam (overhead cable camera above the ground), and 2-3 dedicated slow-motion cameras (filming at 300fps for ultra slow-motion replays).

Hawk-Eye Ball Tracking

Hawk-Eye technology: Hawk-Eye is a ball-tracking system developed by Paul Hawkins (UK) in 2001, first used in Test cricket in 2001 (Channel 4 broadcast of England vs Pakistan at Lord's). How it works: 6-8 high-speed cameras are positioned around the ground, each filming at 100fps. The Hawk-Eye software triangulates the ball's position in three-dimensional space from each camera angle, creating a data point every 10 milliseconds. By extrapolating the ball's trajectory based on its position, spin, and velocity data, Hawk-Eye can calculate where a ball would have gone if it hadn't been intercepted by the batsman. Uses: (1) LBW trajectory prediction: the most important Hawk-Eye use in DRS. When an LBW appeal is reviewed, Hawk-Eye shows (a) whether the ball pitched in line, (b) whether it would have hit the stumps, and (c) the impact point on the batsman's body. The 'Umpire's Call' zone: Hawk-Eye's prediction carries a margin of error of approximately 3.5cm — balls predicted to hit the edge of the stumps within this margin are classified as 'umpire's call' (the on-field decision stands). (2) Trajectory display: broadcasters use Hawk-Eye to show where a delivery pitched and moved — the famous pitch map and wagon wheel are Hawk-Eye outputs. (3) Wagon wheel: tracks where a batsman's runs have been scored around the ground — essential for field placement analysis. Hawk-Eye limitations: Hawk-Eye tracks the ball accurately from the point it leaves the bowler's hand. However, LBW predictions involve extrapolating the trajectory after the ball contacts the batsman's pad (has already interrupted the ball's path) — this extrapolation adds uncertainty. The 'umpire's call' zone exists precisely to acknowledge this uncertainty.

UltraEdge / Snickometer — catching the invisible edge: UltraEdge (international broadcast) and Snickometer (early version, UK broadcasters) detect bat-ball contact via audio analysis — identifying the faint sound made when the ball brushes the edge of the bat. How UltraEdge works: ultra-sensitive stump microphones capture audio at thousands of samples per second. The UltraEdge software identifies the exact audio waveform created by the ball touching the bat edge, which produces a distinctive spike in the audio trace. This is displayed alongside video replays: the audio spike appears at the precise moment of potential contact, allowing the third umpire to determine whether the sound coincided with the ball passing the bat edge. The 'double spike' problem: occasionally UltraEdge produces two audio spikes on a single delivery — one when the ball passes the seam of the pad and one when the ball passes the bat. The third umpire must determine which spike is pad and which is bat (if both are present). In practice, the video and the audio are used together — if the video shows the ball clearly passing the bat with no deviation, but UltraEdge shows an audio spike, the third umpire must judge which is more reliable. HotSpot: HotSpot uses infrared imaging — two infrared cameras (one on each side of the ground) capture the thermal image of the ball and bat. When the ball touches the bat or pad, friction creates a heat signature. HotSpot shows this heat signature as a white mark on a dark background. Limitation: HotSpot requires a significant temperature difference between the ball and the bat — in cold conditions (English cricket in April), the system can fail to detect faint contacts. In hot conditions (India), false positives can occur. HotSpot is expensive and not universally available — Hawk-Eye and UltraEdge are more widely deployed.

Commentary and Analysis

The commentary team: a modern cricket broadcast uses 5-8 commentators per match — including retired players (for analysis), a lead play-by-play commentator, a colour commentator (for statistics and context), and sometimes a specialist role (fielding expert, statistics expert). Notable commentary traditions: Test Match Special (BBC) maintains a tradition of ex-player commentators and literary-style description — Arlott, Swann, Aggers, Tufnell, and Isa Guha have all brought personality alongside expertise. The Richie Benaud legacy: Richie Benaud (Australia, 1924-2015) was the most celebrated cricket commentator in history. His principles: 'put the viewers first; don't say in four words what you can say in one; never say hello and never say goodbye.' His economy of language — only speaking to add information, never to fill silence — defined sophisticated sports broadcasting. Test Match Special's cake tradition: Test Match Special listeners send cakes to the commentary box during Test matches — a tradition that began in the 1970s when listeners discovered the commentators appreciated food. It has become a beloved cultural institution. Pitchvision and broadcast analytics: the final commentary frontier is real-time analytics delivery to commentators — Pitchvision's systems provide live ball-tracking data, batsman scoring zone maps, and predicted match outcomes based on match state (Win Probability). Commentators now receive statistical context on every delivery (this batsman has hit 7 of their 12 sixes off off-spin bowlers) that would have required a researcher overnight in the 1990s.

The DRS review — broadcast and match integration: the Decision Review System integrates all broadcast technologies (Hawk-Eye, UltraEdge, HotSpot) into a match-officiating process. When a team reviews an on-field decision: (1) the third umpire calls for all relevant technologies, (2) reviews each piece of evidence, and (3) communicates their decision to the on-field umpire via earpiece. The on-field umpire then signals out or not-out. The process typically takes 60-120 seconds. The broadcast experience: the reviewing process is shown live on stadium screens and broadcast — viewers see the same Hawk-Eye and UltraEdge evidence as the third umpire, creating an experience where the audience is effectively 'judging alongside' the officials. This transparency is both celebrated (accountability, drama) and criticised (the audience sees every controversial decision played out publicly, which can increase pressure on officials). BCCI and DRS: the BCCI (India's cricket board) resisted DRS until 2016 — they were concerned about technology reliability, particularly Hawk-Eye's LBW prediction accuracy, and the time taken for reviews. From 2016, DRS has been used in all India internationals. The current DRS system: each team has 2 reviews per innings in Tests and ODIs, 1 in T20Is. A successful review (umpire overturned) retains the review; an unsuccessful review (umpire upheld) loses it. Umpire's Call results retain the review.

Frequently asked questions

What is Hawk-Eye in cricket?

Hawk-Eye is a ball-tracking system using 6-8 high-speed cameras to triangulate the ball's three-dimensional position every 10 milliseconds. In cricket, it is primarily used for LBW reviews — predicting where the ball would have gone if it hadn't hit the batsman. It also generates pitch maps, wagon wheels, and trajectory displays for broadcast.

What is the 'Umpire's Call' in cricket DRS?

Umpire's Call applies when Hawk-Eye's LBW prediction shows the ball clipping the edge of the stumps within the technology's margin of error (approximately 3.5cm). In these cases, the on-field umpire's original decision stands — because the technology cannot be sufficiently certain that the umpire was wrong. The review is retained (not lost) when Umpire's Call applies.

How does UltraEdge detect a cricket edge?

UltraEdge uses ultra-sensitive stump microphones to capture audio at thousands of samples per second. When the ball brushes the bat edge, it produces a distinctive audio spike in the trace. This is displayed alongside video so the third umpire can verify whether the audio spike coincided with the ball passing the bat. A clear spike at the right visual moment indicates an edge; no spike indicates the ball missed the bat.

Why did India resist DRS for so long?

The BCCI resisted DRS from its 2009 introduction until 2016, citing concerns about Hawk-Eye's accuracy in LBW prediction (particularly the technology's track record at that time), the disruption to match flow, and philosophical objections to technology overriding human officials. India became the last Full Member to adopt DRS. From 2016, all India internationals use it.