Bilateral vs Franchise Cricket — Key Format Differences
How bilateral international series differ from franchise leagues, and why the tension between them shapes the modern cricket calendar.
Modern cricket is played across two distinct structures: bilateral international series — where two nations play each other in Tests, ODIs, or T20Is — and franchise leagues where players from around the world represent privately owned city-based teams. The growth of franchise cricket has created structural tension with the international game, sparking debates about player availability, the cricket calendar, and what the sport's future looks like.
What Is Bilateral International Cricket?
Bilateral series are the traditional form of international cricket — one country's national team hosting or touring another's, playing a defined number of Tests and white-ball matches. They sit within the ICC Future Tours Programme (FTP), the pre-agreed schedule of international matches. Tests between rival nations like India vs Australia or England vs Pakistan carry enormous prestige and are the foundation of the ICC World Test Championship.
What Is Franchise Cricket?
Franchise cricket is represented by leagues like the IPL, PSL, Big Bash, Caribbean Premier League, SA20, The Hundred, and others. Players are recruited through auctions or drafts, franchises are privately owned, and teams do not represent countries. Players from any nation can play for any franchise, making these leagues highly cosmopolitan. These leagues pay market-rate contracts that often far exceed what national boards can pay.
The Growing Tension
The conflict arises because the cricket calendar has limited space, and franchise leagues — especially the IPL — command enormous broadcast revenue. Some players, particularly those from smaller nations without guaranteed international selection, now earn more from franchise cricket than from international contracts. A few — Sunil Narine is the most famous example — have effectively retired from international cricket to maximise franchise availability. Major boards like BCCI have historically restricted their contracted players from appearing in rival leagues to protect the IPL's exclusivity.
The Future of the Balance
The ICC's FTP scheduling process tries to protect bilateral Test cricket by creating windows — no franchise leagues are scheduled during major ICC events or major bilateral series. But the growth in the number of leagues (six major leagues plus growing domestic T20 competitions across 15+ countries) means scheduling pressure is increasing. The debate over whether Test cricket will remain the pinnacle of the game or be gradually eclipsed by franchise formats is ongoing.
Frequently asked questions
Is franchise cricket regulated by the ICC?
Only indirectly — the ICC does not directly govern franchise leagues but member boards must be ICC-affiliated, and the ICC's anti-corruption and anti-doping rules apply to players wherever they play.
Which franchise league is the most valuable?
The IPL is by far the world's most valuable cricket league, with broadcast rights exceeding $6 billion for a 5-year deal from 2023.
Can a player refuse to play international cricket to join a franchise league?
Players under national board contracts must fulfil their international obligations. Players without such contracts are free to prioritise franchise cricket.
