Mankad Dismissal in Cricket: The Rule, the Controversy, and the Law Change
The Mankad dismissal — running out a non-striker who backs up too far — was once considered unsporting. Since 2022 it is a legitimate run-out under the Laws of Cricket.
A Mankad occurs when the bowler, during the delivery stride, removes the bails at the non-striker's end to dismiss a batter who has backed up too far out of their crease. Named after Indian bowler Vinoo Mankad who used it in 1947, it has long been one of cricket's most debated dismissals.
The Law Change in 2022
Until 2022, a Mankad was classified under 'Unfair Play' (Law 41). The MCC moved it to Law 38 (Run Out) in the 2022 Code update, formally recognising it as a legitimate method of dismissal with no spirit-of-cricket stigma attached.
Why Non-Strikers Back Up
Non-strikers back up — moving out of the crease before the ball is delivered — to gain ground and complete runs more easily. Excessive backing up is an unfair advantage; the Mankad rule discourages it.
The Controversy
Despite the law change, Mankads still generate debate. Many players feel a warning should be given before the dismissal is attempted. Others argue that the law is clear: if you are out of your crease, you risk being run out, no warning required.
Current Consensus
At professional level, most teams now accept the Mankad as legitimate. Youth cricket governing bodies still recommend a warning first to prevent unsporting behaviour at junior level, but the law itself makes no such requirement.
Frequently asked questions
Is a Mankad out in cricket?
Yes. Since the 2022 MCC Law update, a Mankad is classified as a Run Out under Law 38. It is a legitimate dismissal with no requirement for a prior warning.
Who was the first cricketer to use the Mankad dismissal?
Indian all-rounder Vinoo Mankad used the dismissal against Australian non-striker Bill Brown during the 1947 tour, giving the method its name.