Skip to content
Format5 min

Women's Test Cricket: History, Challenges, and the Road Ahead

The history and current state of women's Test cricket — when the first women's Test was played, how the format has evolved, why women's Tests are so rare (only a handful per year globally), the unique four-day format used in modern women's Tests, the efforts to revive the format under the ICC Women's Test Championship, and the leading nations and players defining women's Test cricket today.

Written by GeoCric EditorialUpdated Invalid Date
ShareShareWhatsAppFacebook

Origins and History

Women's Test cricket has a surprisingly long history: the first women's Test match was played between England and Australia in 1934 — just 57 years after the first men's Test in 1877. Women's cricket developed as an organised sport in England in the early 20th century, with the Women's Cricket Association (WCA) establishing the framework that allowed the first international series. The first women's Ashes series in 1934-35 set the template for competitive women's Test cricket, though the schedule has always been far more limited than men's cricket — even in the 1970s and 80s, women played perhaps 2-4 Tests per year worldwide. England, Australia, and India have been the three most active women's Test nations throughout the format's history.

The Four-Day Format

Modern women's Tests are played over four days (not five as in men's Tests). This change reflects both the realities of scheduling (women's cricket programs have fewer available days) and the playing conditions — the four-day format provides enough time for a complete Test match in most cases, as wickets fall at broadly similar rates in women's cricket. A women's Test match has the same structure: two innings per side, unlimited overs (subject to the 4-day limit), same LBW laws, same fielding restrictions. The scoring rate in women's Tests is typically lower than in men's Tests — run rates of 2.5-3.5 per over in the first session — reflecting the bowling quality and pitches used. The four-day format was introduced to make women's Test cricket more financially viable by reducing the venue hire and logistical costs of a fifth day.

ICC Women's Test Championship

The ICC Women's Test Championship was established to give structure to the limited number of women's Tests played globally and create a meaningful competition framework. Before the championship, women's Tests were ad hoc bilateral arrangements with no overall context. Under the championship, Tests are assigned points similar to the men's World Test Championship — win = 12 points, draw = 4, loss = 0 — and the standings determine the leading women's Test nation over each cycle. The championship has been credited with increasing the number of women's Tests played annually (from a handful to 8-12 per year globally) and increasing investment in conditions, umpiring quality, and broadcast coverage of women's Tests. England vs Australia Women's Ashes Tests receive particularly high viewership and media attention.

Women's Test records: the highest individual score in women's Tests is 242 not out by Kiran Baluch for Pakistan against the West Indies in 2004. The highest bowling figures are 10/78 by Shaiza Khan, also for Pakistan. England's Betty Snowball (1935) played in the very first Test series and remained a women's Test player into the late 1940s. Australia's Belinda Clark, widely regarded as one of the greatest women's cricketers, scored the first ODI double century (229 not out) and led Australia's dominant era in women's cricket during the 1990s. These records reflect a format where the historical data set is much smaller than men's cricket.

Frequently asked questions

How many countries play women's Test cricket?

As of 2025, only seven countries have played women's Test cricket: England, Australia, India, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan, and the West Indies. The ICC Women's Test Championship covers these nations. Several other countries (Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe) have ICC women's programs but have not yet played women's Test matches — their programs focus on ODIs and T20Is. The concentration of women's Test cricket among fewer nations than men's reflects the historical investment gap: the top nations have the infrastructure, player depth, and commercial support to prepare for and host Test matches, while emerging women's cricket nations are still building these foundations.

Do women's Tests use different playing conditions from men's?

Women's Tests use a cricket ball of slightly smaller circumference than the men's ball — 21-22.5cm versus 22.4-22.9cm for men's. This smaller ball is easier for women's hands to grip and bowl with (hand-size distribution differs between male and female populations). The pitch dimensions are identical; the bat dimensions and weight used are typically the same as men's cricket (some women prefer slightly lighter bats, but there is no restriction). The fielding circles and playing field dimensions are identical. Overarm bowling was universal in women's cricket from the beginning — the 'underarm' controversy was specific to one men's match in 1981 and never an issue in women's cricket.

Will women's Tests ever match men's Tests in frequency?

The trajectory is toward more women's Tests but parity with men's Tests is unlikely in the near term. England and Australia play women's Ashes Tests on a regular cycle; India has expanded their Test schedule under BCCI investment. The constraints are commercial (Test cricket requires sponsor investment and broadcast deals that women's cricket is still building toward for Test-specific content), logistical (players on professional contracts for limited-overs cricket may not have the match fitness background for Test cricket without adequate preparation matches), and structural (the women's cricket calendar is now so full with T20Is and ODIs that finding multi-week windows for Tests is challenging). The ICC's goal is 6-8 women's Tests annually by 2026 — a meaningful increase even if far below the men's schedule.