The World Test Championship: How the WTC Works, Points System and the Finals
The World Test Championship (WTC) is the ICC's attempt to add context and competition to Test cricket across a 2-year cycle — each Test series earns teams points, and the top two teams from the 2-year table meet in a final. Launched in 2019, the WTC has produced two finals (New Zealand won in 2021, Australia won in 2023). Critics argue it distorts series priorities; supporters argue it gives every Test match a global stakes context that was previously missing.
Why the WTC was created: before the WTC, Test cricket had no global competition structure — series were bilateral (two teams playing each other in isolation) with no points accumulated towards a world title. The 2019 Ashes series had no consequence for Australia or England beyond winning that specific series; there was no overall world Test ranking with tangible prizes. The WTC gave Test cricket: (1) a world champion (the winner of the 2-year cycle's final), (2) a reason for every Test match to matter beyond the bilateral series context, (3) a commercial reason for broadcasters to engage with Test cricket from the perspective of 'the championship', and (4) for smaller Test nations (Ireland, Afghanistan), a pathway to compete for a world title. The structure: 9 teams (the full Test-playing nations minus Zimbabwe and Ireland, who do not have sufficient ICC scheduling to participate) compete in a 2-year cycle. Each series counts towards WTC points — the more Tests in the series, the more points on offer. Top 2 teams at the end of the cycle meet in a Final at Lord's or The Oval. The points system: the WTC uses percentage of points available (not total points) to normalise for different numbers of Tests played. A team that plays 6 series (18+ Tests) cannot be directly compared by total points to a team that plays 4 series (12 Tests). The points percentage allows fair comparison across unequal schedules.
WTC Cycle 1: 2019-2021'
The first WTC cycle (2019-2021): the cycle ran from August 2019 to June 2021. The COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted the cycle — several series were cancelled or rescheduled, creating an uneven schedule. Australia and India dominated the table throughout. The COVID adjustment: the ICC switched the points system mid-cycle from 'points per series' to 'percentage of maximum points available' precisely because COVID cancellations would have unfairly penalised teams who had lost scheduled series. This mid-cycle rule change was controversial but logistically necessary. Final 1 (Southampton, June 2021): New Zealand vs India. New Zealand won by 8 wickets — a comprehensive victory that was simultaneously deserved and somewhat unexpected (India entered as favourites, having beaten Australia in Australia 2020-21). New Zealand captain Kane Williamson was Player of the Match. The match was New Zealand's most significant Test cricket achievement. Conditions: overcast, seamy English conditions suited New Zealand's pace bowling (Boult and Southee) and disadvantaged India's spin-heavy approach. The first WTC cycle's reception: broadly positive — the Final provided a genuinely significant culmination event. The criticism: many felt the points system was too complex; the COVID disruptions created an uneven table that reduced the fairness of the championship.
WTC Cycle 3: 2023-2025'
The third WTC cycle (2023-2025): the cycle ran from June 2023 to early 2025, with 9 participating teams. India and Australia led for much of the cycle; South Africa ultimately qualified alongside Australia for the 2025 WTC Final (Lord's, June 2025) — South Africa won by 5 wickets (Aiden Markram century chasing 282). The current cycle is WTC4 (2025-27). Schedule changes: the ICC revised the schedule to give each team more equal numbers of Tests — the COVID-distorted first cycle highlighted the unfairness of teams playing 6 series vs teams playing 4. The revised FTP (Future Tours Programme) allocates approximately 12-16 Tests per team per WTC cycle, making the percentage system more equitable. WTC criticism — the points distortion: the most consistent criticism of the WTC is that its points system creates perverse incentives. Because each series offers the same percentage of maximum points (regardless of opponent quality), a team that beats Zimbabwe (in a low-intensity series) gains the same proportion as a team that beats India (a much harder series). Teams can therefore plan their WTC campaigns to include easier series for points. The fairness problem: if India plays 6 series (including 2 easy home series vs weaker opponents) and England plays 4 series (all against competitive opponents), India may have a higher WTC percentage despite playing easier cricket overall. The ICC has resisted calls to weight the points by opponent strength — arguing that all Tests are equal. WTC and bilateral cricket priorities: the WTC has created a tension between series-level competitive instincts (a team wants to win the Ashes for its own sake) and WTC points optimisation (a team might play more conservatively to avoid losing WTC points). Critics argue the WTC has reduced aggressive Test cricket; supporters argue it has increased the importance of every ball bowled.
WTC and Test cricket's commercial viability: the ICC sees the WTC as central to Test cricket's long-term commercial sustainability — by creating a world championship structure, the ICC gives broadcasters and sponsors a 'narrative arc' for Test cricket (two years of build-up, culminating in a final). This structure is familiar from ODI and T20 World Cups and makes Test cricket easier to market to audiences who engage with global championship formats. The Alternative: some cricket administrators have proposed a 'Super Series' format — a round-robin tournament among all Test nations, played over a concentrated 6-week period. This would be a genuine global Test championship with every team playing every other team. Objection: Test cricket's 5-day format makes a concentrated tournament impractical (a 9-team round-robin requires 36 series of Tests, which at 5 days per match is thousands of days of cricket — impossible to schedule). The WTC's 2-year bilateral series model is the closest practical approximation to a world championship that works within the existing cricket calendar. Future development: the ICC has proposed expanding the WTC to include Ireland and Zimbabwe — with a qualification system where Associate Members can earn promotion into the WTC table. This would give the WTC a genuine development pathway, connecting Associate cricket to the world championship.
Frequently asked questions
What is the World Test Championship?
The World Test Championship (WTC) is a 2-year points competition involving 9 Test nations. Each series of Tests earns WTC points (expressed as a percentage of maximum available to account for unequal schedules). The top 2 teams from the 2-year table meet in a final. New Zealand won the first WTC (2021) and Australia won the second (2023).
How are WTC points calculated?
WTC points are calculated as a percentage of maximum points available — not total points. This normalises for different numbers of Tests played by each team. A team that plays more series doesn't automatically gain more points in the table, making it fair to compare teams with unequal schedules.
Who has won the World Test Championship?
New Zealand defeated India by 8 wickets in the first WTC Final (Southampton, June 2021). Australia defeated India by 209 runs in the second WTC Final (The Oval, June 2023). South Africa beat Australia by 5 wickets in the third WTC Final (Lord's, June 2025) — Aiden Markram scored a century in the chase. The current cycle is WTC4 (2025-27).
Why do some people criticise the WTC?
Critics argue the WTC creates perverse incentives (teams can gain the same percentage points from beating weaker vs stronger opponents), distorts Test series priorities (WTC points management vs winning the series), and uses a complex points system that most fans don't understand. Supporters argue it gives every Test match a global championship context that was previously missing.
