Skip to content
Rules5 min

Ball Tampering in Cricket: Rules, Controversies, and the 2018 Sandpaper Gate

Ball tampering is the illegal alteration of the cricket ball's surface to gain an unfair advantage — typically to aid swing or reverse swing. The Laws of Cricket allow teams to maintain the ball through polishing (saliva and sweat only) and natural wear; using artificial substances, scratching the ball, or lifting the seam is illegal. The 2018 sandpaper incident involving Australia (Sandpapergate) is the most high-profile ball-tampering scandal in modern cricket history.

Written by GeoCric EditorialUpdated Invalid Date
ShareShareWhatsAppFacebook

Ball tampering definition: the Laws of Cricket (Law 41) prohibit any deliberate attempt to alter the condition of the ball beyond what is permitted (polishing with sweat and saliva on one side; normal wear from bowling and fielding). Illegal alterations: applying artificial substances to the ball (sugar, resin, petroleum jelly); scratching or roughening the surface with fingernails, dirt, bottle tops, or abrasive objects; lifting the seam with fingernails; picking or gouging the leather. Permitted actions: polishing the ball with sweat and saliva (both sides); removing mud; normal maintenance (not altering the condition beyond what fielding naturally causes).

Sandpapergate 2018

Sandpapergate (2018): the most high-profile ball-tampering scandal in cricket history occurred during the third Test between Australia and South Africa in Cape Town, March 2018. Australian batsman Cameron Bancroft was caught on television cameras using a piece of yellow sandpaper to scratch the surface of the ball in the rough-up area. After initially trying to hide the sandpaper in his trousers, Bancroft admitted to the tampering in the post-match press conference. The investigation revealed that the plan was conceived by captain Steve Smith, vice-captain David Warner, and Bancroft in a team leadership meeting during the lunch break. Cricket Australia's response: Steve Smith (captain) — 12-month international suspension; David Warner (vice-captain) — 12-month international suspension plus a lifetime ban from leadership positions; Cameron Bancroft (player) — 9-month international suspension.

The aftermath and return of Smith and Warner: Steve Smith and David Warner served their 12-month bans (Smith missed approximately 15 Test matches). Smith returned to international cricket in 2019 for the Ashes in England — his return was one of cricket's most dramatic comebacks. He scored 774 runs at an average of 110.57 in the 5-Test series — the highest average for any batsman in an Ashes series since Don Bradman. England's crowds booed Smith throughout the series, but he responded by batting at an extraordinary level. Warner's return was more complicated — he struggled in his first year back, but eventually returned to form. Bancroft returned to domestic and then international cricket. The Sandpapergate aftermath dominated Australian cricket for approximately 2 years and produced significant reflection on Australian cricket culture.

Historical Incidents

Historical ball-tampering incidents: ball tampering has been suspected or confirmed across cricket history: (1) Pakistan teams in the 1990s were repeatedly accused of deliberate reverse swing engineering through illegal ball alteration — though they argued their bowlers simply mastered legitimate reverse swing skills faster than other countries; (2) India's Mohammad Azharuddin was implicated in a 2000 match-fixing scandal that also involved allegations of altered balls; (3) England's Marcus Trescothick admitted in his autobiography to using a Murray Mint (sugary boiled sweet) on the ball to increase grip — technically an illegal substance; (4) South Africa's Faf du Plessis was charged with ball tampering in 2016 (applying saliva after eating a mint) — found guilty by the ICC, fined 50% of match fee. The difference between Sandpapergate and these incidents: explicit premeditation, a tool (sandpaper), and senior leadership involvement made the Australia incident categorically worse.

ICC Penalties

ICC ball-tampering penalties: the ICC Code of Conduct Level 2 charge (moderate violation) covers most ball-tampering incidents — fine 50-100% of match fee plus 1-2 suspension points. Level 3 (serious — match bans) applies to more deliberate incidents. Level 4 (most serious) can apply to organised team-wide schemes. Under current ICC rules, if a team is found to have tampered with the ball, the ball is replaced with a similar-condition legal ball; the batting team receives 5 penalty runs; and the guilty player(s) face ICC Code of Conduct hearings. TV review has made ball tampering much harder to conceal — cameras now specifically monitor fielders handling the ball, and the DRS's ball-tracking cameras provide an additional surveillance mechanism that has deterred tampering beyond what umpires can see directly.

Frequently asked questions

What is ball tampering in cricket?

Ball tampering in cricket is the illegal alteration of the cricket ball's surface or condition to gain an unfair advantage — typically to enhance swing or reverse swing. The Laws of Cricket allow teams to maintain the ball through polishing with sweat and saliva and through normal wear from bowling and fielding, but prohibit deliberate changes such as: applying artificial substances (vaseline, resin, sugar); scratching or roughening the ball's surface with abrasive objects (sandpaper, bottle tops, fingernails); or lifting the seam with fingernails. If caught, the fielding team concedes 5 penalty runs and the player faces an ICC Code of Conduct hearing. The 2018 Sandpapergate incident (Australia vs South Africa) is the most high-profile confirmed case of ball tampering.

What happened in Sandpapergate cricket?

Sandpapergate occurred during the third Test between Australia and South Africa in Cape Town in March 2018. Australian batsman Cameron Bancroft was caught on television cameras using a small piece of yellow sandpaper to scratch the surface of the cricket ball (to rough it up on one side for reverse swing purposes). After initial denials, Bancroft and captain Steve Smith admitted the plan was premeditated — conceived in a team leadership meeting during the lunch break, involving Smith, vice-captain David Warner, and Bancroft. Cricket Australia issued unprecedented sanctions: Steve Smith and David Warner each received 12-month international cricket bans plus David Warner received a lifetime leadership ban; Cameron Bancroft received a 9-month ban. The scandal dominated Australian cricket news for two years and led to a comprehensive review of Cricket Australia's team culture.

Is using saliva on a cricket ball legal?

Traditionally, using saliva on the cricket ball was legal — it is one of the permitted methods for maintaining the ball's condition (keeping one side shiny to enhance swing). However, the ICC temporarily banned the use of saliva during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) due to infection risk, and following the pandemic review, the ICC made the saliva ban permanent from 2022 onward. From 2022: applying saliva to the cricket ball is now illegal; only sweat (natural perspiration from polishing the ball against clothing) is permitted for ball maintenance. The ban has affected conventional swing (which relies partly on the contrast between the polished and rough sides maintained by saliva) — some bowlers and analysts argue it has reduced the effectiveness of swing bowling in general, potentially affecting Test cricket results.