Skip to content
Rules5 min

Deepti Sharma and the Mankad Dismissal: India's Most Controversial Women's Cricket Moment

The 2022 Deepti Sharma Mankad dismissal of Charlie Dean at Lord's — what happened, why it was legal, cricket's historical debate around the Mankad, how the MCC moved the Law in 2022 to eliminate its 'unfair play' stigma, and Deepti's career context.

Written by GeoCric EditorialUpdated Invalid Date
ShareShareWhatsAppFacebook

On 24 September 2022, India women's bowler Deepti Sharma dismissed England's Charlie Dean by the Mankad method at Lord's Cricket Ground — running out the non-striking batter (Dean) at the bowler's end before completing the bowling action when Dean had backed up too far down the pitch. England needed 17 runs from 17 balls; India were 3-2 in the series with this match at stake. The dismissal was immediately legal under the Laws of Cricket, secured victory for India by 16 runs, and sparked days of debate in the English cricket media about sportsmanship, fair play, and whether the Mankad was an 'acceptable' method of dismissal.

What Is the Mankad Dismissal?

The Mankad (named after India bowler Vinoo Mankad who twice dismissed Australia's Bill Brown by this method in 1947-48) involves the bowler running out the non-striking batter at the bowler's end during the delivery stride — before the ball is bowled. The non-striker must remain in their crease until the ball leaves the bowler's hand; if they leave early (to gain ground on potential runs), the bowler can break the wicket instead of completing the delivery. Under the Laws, this was categorised under 'Unfair Play' (Law 41) until 2022 — the 'unfair' label carried a stigma suggesting it was technically legal but contrary to the spirit of cricket. The MCC moved the Mankad to Law 38 (Run Out) in October 2022 — taking effect before the Deepti Sharma incident — eliminating the 'unfair play' categorisation. The dismissal was entirely within the revised law.

The Deepti Sharma Incident at Lord's

The Lord's incident divided opinion sharply along national lines: English media described the dismissal as 'not cricket' and 'against the spirit of the game,' arguing India should have warned Dean before running her out; Indian media and many neutral observers noted the dismissal was legal, that the non-striker backing up early is an acknowledged competitive advantage, and that the MCC had explicitly reclassified the Mankad as a conventional run-out three weeks before the match. Deepti Sharma herself had warned Charlotte Edwards (England captain in a different match) before using the Mankad previously — making the claim she acted without warning factually contested depending on which match was referenced. The incident became a case study in cricket's 'spirit of the game' concept: the Laws and the spirit can diverge, and different cricketing cultures interpret the threshold differently.

Deepti Sharma is India women's most important all-rounder — a right-arm off-spinner and left-handed middle-order batter who made her ODI debut in 2014 at age 17. She has taken 100+ international wickets and averages above 40 with the bat in ODIs. Her bowling is effective across formats because her off-spin, variations, and slow-medium deliveries work on subcontinent turning tracks and in conditions where accuracy is rewarded over pace. The Mankad dismissal at Lord's obscured her career achievement in the 2022 series — she took 5 wickets across the three ODIs and was India's most consistent performer.

The Spirit of Cricket Debate

The Deepti Sharma case crystallised cricket's ongoing tension between the written Laws and the 'spirit of cricket' — a concept embedded in the preamble of the Laws of Cricket but not defined precisely enough to generate consistent application. The spirit of cricket is most often invoked when a technically legal action is considered ethically questionable: the Mankad, claiming catches that may have bounced, appealing for dismissals the fielding team knows to be not out, or batsmen deliberately kicking the ball away from fielders. The law change (October 2022 MCC reclassification of the Mankad) was specifically intended to remove the 'unfair' label and clarify that non-strikers backing up early to gain a competitive advantage are legitimately at risk of run-out — the bowler's right to defend against that advantage is recognised in law.

Frequently asked questions

What happened when Deepti Sharma Mankaded Charlie Dean at Lord's?

24 September 2022 — India needed a wicket to win the final ODI of the women's series. Deepti Sharma ran out Charlie Dean (non-striker, backed up too far down the pitch) before completing her delivery, securing India's victory by 16 runs with 17 balls remaining. Completely legal under Law 38 (Run Out) as reclassified by the MCC three weeks before the incident. The dismissal sparked the latest major controversy in cricket's recurring debate about the Mankad and the spirit of the game.

Is the Mankad legal in cricket?

Yes — completely legal under Law 38 (Run Out) as of October 2022, when the MCC removed the Mankad from Law 41 (Unfair Play) where it had previously been categorised. The reclassification was specifically designed to remove the stigma of 'unfair' from a dismissal the MCC considered legitimate: non-strikers backing up early gain a competitive advantage; the bowler's right to counter that is recognised in law.

Who is Deepti Sharma?

India women's leading all-rounder — right-arm off-spinner and left-handed middle-order batter who debuted at age 17 in 2014. She has taken 100+ international wickets and averages above 40 in ODIs with the bat. She is one of India's most important players across all formats, contributing as a genuine all-rounder rather than primarily as a batter or bowler.